<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SyndicateMizzou Video Podcast</title>
    <link>http://www.syndicatemizzou.org</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <generator>Center for eResearch</generator>
    <description>Connecting you with the University of Missouri’s innovative research and creative activity</description>
    
    <item>
      <title>SyndicateMizzou Podcast: Ted  Tarkow - Classifying Cicero’s Catilinarians</title>
      <link>http://syndicatemizzou.org/resources/urm2006/ipod/URM-Lee.m4v</link>
      <category>Education</category>
      <guid>http://syndicatemizzou.org/resources/urm2006/ipod/URM-Lee.m4v</guid>
      <description>####Tiffany Lee, Department of Classical Studies

####Barbara Wallach, Mentor

This project is examining the traditional classification of Cicero’s orations against Catiline.  Usually these four orations are classified as invective speeches, or speeches of blame.  I have been comparing the content, motives, and context of the first and fourth Catilinarian orations to the precepts given in rhetorical texts written by Cicero and other texts on oratory used in the same time period.  I have found through my comparisons of the texts that these orations against Catiline fit the ideal model for judicial speeches much more closely than they fit the pattern for epideictic speeches.</description>
      <duration>3</duration>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:32:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="http://syndicatemizzou.org/resources/urm2006/ipod/URM-Lee.m4v" type="video/quicktime"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
